Obama Health Care

This is an open letter to the entire Democratic Party.

The majority of the United States of America does not want your health care bill.  The polls prove it, yet you refuse to accept the fact.  You blame racism.  I’m going to dispell that right now. 

Let me tell you what racism in America is today.  Racism is when you vote for someone because of that person’s race, an nothing else.  Racism is when you ignore issues, ignore what you stand for, ignore what you know to be right, and instead vote for someone because “it’s time we had an African-American President”.  How many African-Americans do you suppose voted for Obama because he’s black whether they agree with his policies or not?  How many do you suppose voted for him and didn’t know anything about his policies?  How many do you suppose voted for President and left the rest of the ballot blank?  I think someone probably has the statistics on that, but we’re never going to see it because it would be WAY too telling.  THAT is racism. 

Now with that in mind, how do you suppose the election would have gone if Obama wasn’t black?  It was a pretty close race.  If it had been a landslide I would concede that he won on platform.  And by that I mean that he won by convincing enough people that he was the “change” we all needed.  But that is not the case.  If you eliminate the voters that voted for him simply because he’s black and most likely wouldn’t have voted at all otherwise, he loses. 

Here’s the point of this whole thing:  If you eliminate the race issue, the election results show us that the majority of America CLEARLY is not on the left.  This is simple proof that the majority of America does not want your health care bill.  We don’t think that way.  We want Liberty more than we want government control.  Americans are mostly in the center politically.  If every adult in America took a 10-question quiz that was designed to determine their political leaning and was worded in a way that the answers aren’t blatantly left or right, most people would be shown to be in the center.  You know I’m correct here even though you tell us otherwise.  So with that in mind, what makes you think it’s acceptable to run the country in an extremely leftist way?  And make no mistake, that is what you are attempting to do.  It doesn’t matter what YOU want if WE don’t support it.  You are supposed to represent US.  When you stop doing that, you become useless and expendible.  You become a problem instead of an asset, something that we need to rid ourselves of.  And when we rid ourselves of you, your career-ending agendas will be the only thing to blame.  It is such a sad thing that we have to threaten to vote you out in order to force you to represent us.   What does that say about you? 

If you were to suddenly become honest and find some inetgrity, you would not be able to do this to your constituents.

Are Democrats Communists?

That’s right, are they communists?  The Democratic Party has slowly been evolving.  It’s taken a long time, and now most Americans don’t even recognize what it has become. 

What is communism?  What is it that makes communism communism?  It’s redistribution of wealth.  When your government takes your money and gives it to who they say needs it, that’s communism.  You see, we have a society here that works on capitalism.   Capitalism is where you do what you do and the money you earn is yours.  If you do it well and there is a good enough market for it, you will become successful.  Even rich.  It’s what makes “the pursuit of happiness” possible.  But these days the Democrats are all about taking your money (in the form of taxes) to give it to who they think need it more than you do.  It doesn’t matter how hard you’ve worked for it, or even if what you did to earn it helped people.  They want to take it from you regardless.  And like I said before, government imposed wealth redistribution is communism.  Don’t believe me?  Look it up.

A communist society works to eliminate classes.  There are no rich people and no poor people.  Everyone is the same, and the government takes care of them all with the money earned and products made by the people.  At least in theory.  We see how well it’s worked in every nation that has tried it. 

Let me back all this up by calling to your attention the fact that Socialism is, literally, the halfway point between capitalism and communism.  (look that up too while you’re at it)  Socialized medicine anyone?  I’m telling you, our Democratic “leaders” are leading us down the path to communism, and we don’t even see it.  Every time a signpost comes up that says “This way to communism”, a faithful Democrat jumps in front of it to block our view as we all mosey right on by.  And who is one of the worst offenders?  Barrack Obama.  Yeah, let’s elect him President! 

The only way to save our nation is with smaller federal government and more power at the state level.  I’m afraid there’s too many dumb-asses in this country being told what to think, so I don’t expect us to fix it.  We’ve let ourselves become tools of our goverment instead of the other way around, the way it was designed to be, intented to be.  If enough of us wake up, there is hope.  Hello?  Is this thing on?

~tap tap~

[cue chirping crickets]

Barack Obama & Reverend Wright – Why it Matters

Let’s look at the facts.  Obama called Wright his mentor.  He attended Wright’s church for 20 years.  He named his book, The Audacity of Hope, after one of Wright’s sermons.  Jeremiah Wright was a major force in the development of the man Barack Obama has become.  Why is any of this an issue?  To answer that question, we have to look at who Jeremiah Wright is.  What does he believe, what does he stand for, what does he teach?

Wright was interviewed on the Hannity & Colmes show in March 2007.  In that interview, Wright said to Hannity, “Let me suggest that you do some reading before you come and talk to me about my field.”  The reading he wants Hannity to do concerns a thing called Black Liberation Theology.  He repeatedly asked, as a counter to anything Hannity asked him, “How many of Cone’s books have you read?”  The Cone in question is James Cone , author of Black Theology and Black Power. 

Cone stated that Malcolm X was “not far off” when he said, “Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.”  To James Cone, all White people are responsible for racism and slavery.  It’s every Black man’s responsibility to destroy the White man.  These are the values that Barack Obama grew up with.  Whether or not he wants us to know it, this is what he believes.  How can we make this man our leader?

Political Protestors

You’ve seen them.  They go to any non-liberal event and try to outnoise whoever is speaking to disrupt them and to keep people from hearing what the speakers have to say.  Isn’t this an infringement on the speaker’s right to free speech?  And if we have a right to free speech, doesn’t that go hand in hand with a right to free listening?  I believe it does.  We have the right to listen to whomever we want to listen to.  Otherwise, the right to free speech is useless. 

So here’s what I’m getting at.  Why do we allow these people to do it?  We let them stand there and shout and be in the way.  We let them take away our basic rights.  We can’t remove them by force, no matter how attractive that idea is.  It’s not legal so it puts us in the same group as them (annoying, uninformed assholes).  So it looks like we have to let them be there doing what they came to do.  They are going to disrupt the event no matter what we do, we have to just deal with that.  Here’s what I propose: 

First, we must NEVER do to them what they do to us.  Don’t try to drown out the speaker at liberal events.They are in the wrong and we mustn’t join that club. 

Second, bring a bullhorn to the event and get in THEIR face.  Stand right in front of them and say “blah blah blah” every time they speak.  We can’t stop them from disrupting, but we can stop them from spreading their message at events where no one in attendance wants to hear them.

Third, make your own signs supporting the event and stand right in front of the liberal sign holders to block anyone from seeing their sign.  They are pasty-skinned hippies who hate violence, we should have no problem outmaneuvering them. 

Don’t touch them unless it’s in self defense, and even then only when you have cameras on you to document the fact that they started the violence.  They often do because they are hypocrites who preach peace and love until someone gets on their nerves.  Simply stand in their way and smile, all the while blocking any attempt they make at disruption.  Fair play.

Are Muslims our enemies?

There’s a lot of talk these days about muslims.  Who are these guys?  What do they want?  Why do they keep trying to kill everybody?  It’s very confusing to a non-muslim.  You’ve got some people saying muslims are bad, and some people saying only some muslims are bad, and some people saying muslims are all peaceful.  What’s a poor white guy to think?

In my opinion, it boils down to one thing.  Sharia.  Sharia is islamic law.  It’s the thing that some countries have that makes clerics able to tell the government what to do.  And it is completely incompatible with Democracy.

I’m sure not all muslims are our enemies.  At least that is my hope.  But what makes one muslim our enemy and another muslim our friend?  Sharia.  If someone is in favor of replacing the US Constitution with the koran and governing the USA with sharia law, that person is our enemy.

Racial Profiling

A letter to Congress to address the House’s passing of legislation that will make profiling illegal:

According to the Congressional Research Service, profiling is defined “as
the practice of targeting individuals for police or security interdiction,
detention or other disparate treatment based primarily on their race or
ethnicity [or religion], in the belief that certain minority groups are more
likely to engage in unlawful behavior.”

Well, the fact is that certain minority groups ARE more likely to engage in
unlawful behavior.  Look at statistics.  It is simply common sense to
acknowledge this fact.  It is foolishness to deny it.  When certain minority
groups stop doing the majority of the crimes, then it will be appropriate to
stop profiling. 

While profiling based on race, religion or ethnicity is not guaranteed to be
100% effective law enforcement (Timothy McVeigh and John Walker Lindh, both white males, would not be identified), the majority of people committing
crimes WOULD fall into one of the profiled catagories.  How can you deny
this to be true?  Your first instinct might be to call me racist, but is
anything I’m saying not factually true?  And is it racist to call something
what it is?  Let’s get a grip on our thought processes here and use facts
instead of feelings to make policy decisions.  Look at the way the world is
today, the problems we have now that we didn’t used to have, and deal with
them in an intelligent way.  Maybe there are things we don’t want to do that
are just necessary now.  This is important stuff, lives depend on it.  The
right choice might be a tough one, it might be an unpopular one, but that
doesn’t make it less right. 

The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to be safe from unreasonable search and seizure without probable cause. Perhaps what needs to be addressed is the definition of what is “unreasonable”
today under the current circumstances. 

It’s a fact that the majority of terrorist activity in the world today is done by Arab-looking males between the ages of 18 and 40.  It is nothing less than incompetence to ignore this fact.  Another thing to consider; what are gangsters and gang members known for?  Charity work?  I don’t think so.
That is another very specific look, and to not suspect people who insist on
adopting that look is just plain stupid.  When a guy who looks like he might
put a gun in your face actually puts a gun in your face because you ignored
common sense and didn’t keep a distance between you and him, will you still say profiling is wrong?   Will you not learn from that lesson, assuming you’re still alive, and do some intelligent profiling next time you’re in that situation?

Profiling works.  To outlaw it so we don’t hurt anyone’s feelings shows a
complete lack of common sense and an inability to act intelligently.

Virginia Tech

There’s about to be a big debate, so here’s my two cents worth.

“What is the militia?  It is the whole people.  To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason (father of the Bill of Rights)

“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson

You’ve probably seen the bumper sticker that says “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns”.  Now you have proof that the framers had that opinion too.

Imus

Heard a rap song lately?

The “we can say it but you can’t” crap needs to stop.  Either it’s wrong to say or it’s not wrong to say.  You can’t have it both ways.  Pick one. 

A Helpful Tip

If you are a girl, and you have unprotected sex while you’re ovulating, there is a very good chance that you will become pregnant. 

 I’m just sayin…

Urine Test

I got an email today that has one of the best ideas I’ve heard in a long time.

Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I  pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as they see fit. In  order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test,  which I have no problem with. 

What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people  who don’t have to pass a urine test. Shouldn’t one have to pass a urine  test to get a welfare check, because I have to pass one to earn it for  them? 

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their  feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sit on  their butt. Could you imagine how much money the state would save if  people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?